Topic: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Hi ,

Id like to know if there is a list of changes/advancements to WolfCMS over FrogCMS?

Cheers,
Pete

Thumbs up

2

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Hi Pete: The main things to see at the moment are Wolf's first stable release and the roadmap. Beyond that, there are the site resources here (especially the wiki) which represent development from Frog's community tools. (In addition, see the myriad or methods of staying in touch with Wolf's development detailed on the Home page.)

3

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

old thread but... still relevant I think. I have been googling a lot for CMSes lately, and FrogCMS is quite appreciated and talked about. I couldn't find Wolf until I was searching for CodeIgniter CMSes.

Anyway, the roadmap link is not working here, so it would be nice to see it.

Also I would like to know how finished this CMS is. Is it very buggy? Or very stable? At least the documentation seems confusing, and the general navigation of the site is quite strange. On the front page there was a link to WHY to migrate to wolf-cms, and it was only a thread about HOW to migrate.

The features page are not so descriptive either. What's great about frog CMS is that it is so straight forward. Neatly and cleanly it has what you need, without confusing management, and you use php code which you already might know, and is very much more powerful than a new scripting language or something like that... well it seems wolf is pretty much the same, but i'm worried that you might put too many features there, and make it bloated (let alone buggy, LET ALONE UNDOCUMENTED!).

In this world full of incomplete CMSes, it would be nice to see a stable and straight-forward one shining. And I hope you don't find me too critisizing, because wolf is one of the few I couldn't help trying out smile

Thumbs up

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Roadmap is working just fine.

Frog was good in it's old days, but it's kind a dead now for more then year and a half (at least). All core team from Frog moved to Wolf cool

ribot wrote:

Also I would like to know how finished this CMS is. Is it very buggy? Or very stable?

It's finished and differs a lot from Frog. Current stable release is version 0.7.5 (0.8.0 should be out sometime in Autumn). Stable release is not buggy at all, at least I haven't had any problems with it so far (multiple sites).

As for docs and wiki, it's kind of work in progress as we changed few things and more will come soon I hope.

ribot wrote:

In this world full of incomplete CMSes, it would be nice to see a stable and straight-forward one shining.

One stable coming right up... wink

Btw, welcome to the forum smile

Wolf CMS Paper Guy
Wolf CMS related blog / journal at Project 79 | Wolf CMS Docs

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

ribot wrote:

old thread but... still relevant I think. I have been googling a lot for CMSes lately, and FrogCMS is quite appreciated and talked about. I couldn't find Wolf until I was searching for CodeIgniter CMSes.

We'll work on our exposure. smile This thread is no longer relevant as Frog CMS is dead in the water. It has not been updated since I left that project to start Wolf CMS.

Also, I would like to warn anyone reading this that Frog CMS has some major security issues that go unfixed due to the fact is isn't updated.

ribot wrote:

Anyway, the roadmap link is not working here, so it would be nice to see it.

Works fine for me. Where are you finding that broken link?

ribot wrote:

Also I would like to know how finished this CMS is. Is it very buggy? Or very stable?

Wolf CMS is more stable and more finished than Frog CMS. It is used by quite a lot of people quit happily to run their production sites on.

ribot wrote:

At least the documentation seems confusing, and the general navigation of the site is quite strange.

What exactly do you find strange about it?

ribot wrote:

On the front page there was a link to WHY to migrate to wolf-cms, and it was only a thread about HOW to migrate.

Point taken. That page should be removed as Frog CMS is dead in the water and Wolf CMS development has advanced to a point that compatibilty between the two is unlikely.

ribot wrote:

The features page are not so descriptive either.

Equally descriptive as the one for Frog. I admit it could use a polish up.

ribot wrote:

What's great about frog CMS is that it is so straight forward. Neatly and cleanly it has what you need, without confusing management, and you use php code which you already might know, and is very much more powerful than a new scripting language or something like that... well it seems wolf is pretty much the same, but i'm worried that you might put too many features there, and make it bloated (let alone buggy, LET ALONE UNDOCUMENTED!).

That's beginning to sound like a commercial for Frog...

There is a HECK of a lot more documentation on Wolf CMS than on Frog. As for Wolf CMS resembling Frog. That is correct. Wolf was a fork of Frog. I personally coded and released the last two versions of Frog before I left to found the Wolf CMS project.

ribot wrote:

In this world full of incomplete CMSes, it would be nice to see a stable and straight-forward one shining. And I hope you don't find me too critisizing, because wolf is one of the few I couldn't help trying out smile

I you liked the idea of Frog, then you'll love Wolf CMS. As I said, I was the main (only actually) developer for Frog 0.9.4 and 0.9.5 and left that project as the project lead was not active anymore and would not give the project into another manager's hands. No work was done on Frog CMS since I left because all that work has gone into Wolf CMS.

Hope that answers your questions. Feel free to look around the wiki, there's TONS of information there... we were already contemplating how to better organize the information.

Wolf CMS founder and lead developer
Please always check the Support forums and Wiki before asking. (My Ohloh account.)
Like Wolf CMS? Consider making a financial contribution.

6

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Hey mvdkleijn, thanks for your reply smile

The broken link to the roadmap is in David's post above.

You say frog is dead in the water, but as I said, I found a lot of references to it on the web, while not to wolf hmm I didn't mean to advertise frog, as I've just installed it and tested (which I hadn't done yet with wolf when I posted this). I noticed however that there are a lot of CMSes out there that are not well documented, and it might take a few days of trying it out before you really notice.

Just think about it: you write some really neat software and a lot of features are not used because of the unavailability of straight-forward and easy documentation. I know there is a lot of work behind what you do, and it takes a lot of time with the documentation... but I think it could benefit more ppl to have more documentation rather than features that very few will ever use.

I'm not saying frog is well documented, but as frog isn't developed there isn't much hope for that. I'm saying I hope wolf will be! For example I wanted to see how to make a plugin, and went to http://www.wolfcms.org/wiki/tutorial:plugin which doesn't mention there is an example like the ./wolf/plugins/skeleton directory.  Neither does it mention the Controller class, which I just assumed should be named CamelCased based on the plugin id (would be named camel_cased for the CamelCasedController). There was also a cheat-sheet for the plugin creation which I don't see on the documentation menu. I have not looked into it so much yet, but this was my first impression. Are there doc pages that are not displayed in the menu?

You have a demo of wolf displayed on the frontpage, but when I clicked the admin link I still couldn't get to neither a login screen or the admin panel at all. That's what I can say for now. Btw it was really easy to start my plugin now that I posted on the forum and got quick replies. I want to be tough in criticism because I think wolf has good potential.

- Robin

Last edited by ribot (2011-09-20 09:36)

Thumbs up

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Just my two cents:
Wolf CMS is a work in progress and so is its documentation.
A great feature of the wiki documentation is that you can edit pages and contribute to it:
if you feel that a subject lacks important/usefull information then please add it so it helps others.

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

There is a bug in the Wolf demo.

I do not see why anyone would choose Frog over Wolf. Wolf is a fork of the last release of Frog so it is definitely ahead of Frog in development.

Frog is not being developed any more, so you are not going to get any improvements, and no one is going to fix security problems.

If you find the documents are incomplete, ask on the forums. They are helpful, and I have got answers to every question I have asked.

Thumbs up

9

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Whilst I agree that Wolf is 200% better than Frog (especially with Frog's forum being full of spam - or so I found in my research), I see the point that Wolf doesn't get the mention it deserves. As a bit of an experiment, I just tried a few different searches along the lines of "best cms" and "free simple cms".

Most results were blogger who listed various content management systems. A lot of them actually mentioned Frog, I didn't find any who mentioned Wolf until I added "wolf" to the search phrase. So how do we get the word out there? I personally am a pretty strong believer that Wolf is one of the better CMS's out there and deserves to be in the some league as the big 3 (Joomla, Drupal (which I don't really like myself, to be honest) and WordPress).

Bah! Humbug!

10

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

dover wrote:

... So how do we get the word out there? ...

That question is one I've been pondering since Wolf's launch. As we all appreciate, the line between spreading the word and spamming can be fairly fine. smile Even so, I've done what I can to flag it up on "best CMS" comment threads (if it's missed off the list), other forums (as appropriate), monitoring Twitter and sending replies, etc.

For example, we noticed quite a spike in interest when this list put Wolf at the top. We could do with more of those!

I suppose we could also benefit from some high-profile adopters and sites! Hopefully that will happen as the word filters out. It is in wider use than people probably appreciate, but for all that (as this thread illustrates), too often flies under the radar. hmm

And maybe, given the continued misunderstandings about Wolf in relation to Frog, we should put some more "official" history of things on the front page of the wiki. (Those interested can see my personal version.) wink

11

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

David wrote:

[And maybe, given the continued misunderstandings about Wolf in relation to Frog

On that train of thought, it might be good to stress just how different Wolf is now (and will continue to become) to Frog - as well as the obvious, Frog isn't be developed.

We could always use that good vibe from what Frog was to benefit Wolf though in any exposure.. it's a fork after all and we do have the great mvdkleijn developing Wolf who is from the Frog team.

Bah! Humbug!

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

dover wrote:

it's a fork after all and we do have the great mvdkleijn developing Wolf who is from the Frog team.

Aww shucks... smile


I actually got emailed threats when I forked by the way, despite my explanation of the reasons.

Wolf CMS founder and lead developer
Please always check the Support forums and Wiki before asking. (My Ohloh account.)
Like Wolf CMS? Consider making a financial contribution.

13

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

I'm not surprised.

Bah! Humbug!

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Just thought I'd wake this slumbering thread to offer my thanks for & kudos to the WolfCMS project.  I maintain a simple 10 page site and have been looking for a small, simple & practical CMS for years.  Well, WolfCMS is almost perfect! ("almost", only because I didn't write it...;)

I've tried many a CMS, from the Drupal/Joomla/Wordpress -esque CMS's, to the small, simple, and plucky CMS's.  And while they all have their strengths and uses, none of them were suitable for my little project.

Then, last night, since it had been a while since I'd looked to see what was out there, I type "simple CMS" into Google.  Well, the forth result was a link to an article titled: "10 Simple and Light Weight CMS Solutions | Tools".  WolfCMS was the the first one discussed.  I read the synopsis provided, and just went from there.

Now, while I have just began to learn WolfCMS, I am looking forward it.

Thanks again!

Thumbs up

15

Re: WolfCMS vs FrogCMS

Self Evident wrote:

... Well, WolfCMS is almost perfect! ("almost", only because I didn't write it...;) ...

Now, while I have just began to learn WolfCMS, I am looking forward it.

Glad you found us, and hope it works well for you, S.E. wink